 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
FIRM DESCRIPTION, OFFICES, LIST OF CLIENTS, LATEST NEWS & RECENT PUBLICATIONS |
  |
FIRM DESCRIPTION |
||
OFFICES Head Office Associate offices at: (2) 1-C Beli Road, Allahabad, 211002. (3) Chamber No. 6, Lawyers Chamber, Judicial Complex, Panchkula, Haryana Websites: |
||
LATEST NEWS * Considering the on going expansion plans of the firm, there is vacancy for 3 to 4 Assistant-Associate positions, 1 to 2 Associate positions, and there is vacancy for 1 Associate having an experience of minimum 2 years in litigation on the criminal side. All interested candidates may apply for the said positions by sending their applications and resume to mail@thepractice.in or tripathianupam@hotmail.com and seek an appointment for interview. In alternate, Interested candidates may also call us at 011-22785195, 011-32002891, 011- 65105339 or 9899874982 between 4:00 P.M. -7:30 P.M. Monday to Friday and seek appointment for interview. Interested candidates can also walk-in to our office between Monday to Friday from 4:30 to 6:30 P.M. (After Seeking Appointment.)
* The Firm apologizes to all its patrons and well wishers for being unable to organize the proposed Late Justice H.C.P Tripathi Memorial National Moot Court Competition in year 2008 on account of some unforeseen occurrence and consequently the awaited event stood cancelled for the year 2008. However the firm wishes to share with all its well wishers that The Late Justice H.C.P Tripathi Memorial National Moot Court Competition 2009 shall be organized in the month of October 2009, in New Delhi. All law schools & colleges shall be sent invitations in the months of June-July 2009 for sending their students for participation. Further details and information regarding competition, rules of the competition and moot problem shall be put on the website at later dates. All interested law colleges and law schools may send there expression of interest in participation of their college in the moot court competition vide email at mail@thepractice.in. (Write participation in moot court in subject column.)
* The Firm welcomes the following members who have recently joined/associated themselves with it ; Mr. Sudhir Prashant (Assistant –Associate, New Delhi), Ms. Babita (Associate, New Delhi) Mr. M.P.S Bindra (Senior Consultant, Panchkula) Mr. Amandeep Bindra (Consultant, Panchkula & Chandigarh) Miss. Apeksha Vohra (Consultant, Mumbai) Mr. Israr Ahmed Khan (Consultant, Ranchi)
* The Firm once again proved its expertise and excellence in handling consumer cases with perfection and added another feather in its cap. The Firm succeeded in obtaining a favorable order for its client in February, 2009 against reputed IT Company Hewlett Packard (Commonly known as H.P). The District Consumer Forum at Qutub, Delhi has ordered the H.P to pay a sum of more than 23,000 /- Rupees to the Firm’s client in form of compensation. Thus the firm has yet again achieved success in satisfying its clients and promises to do so in the future as well. * You can now catch Mr. Anupam Tripathi speak on a variety of legal issues and answer your quries live every tuesday only on 104.8 FM Radio between 2-3 p.m. |
||
LIST OF SOME OF THE CLIENTS WE REPRESENT |
||
| MR.Bharat Bhushan M/SCredit Solutions MR.Nitin Gupta MRS.Nita Srivastava MR.ML Sons Jewellers MR.SK Sharma MRS.Sujata Ray Mr. Naveen Mr. Anjan Roy Ms. Renu Rathee Mr. Saurabh Mittal Mr. MUKESH PANDEY M/SGOLD PLUS GLASSES Mrs. Renu Saini/Mr. bs. Saini Mr. MJ Singh Mr. Sanjay Panwar Mr. Amit Sharma Ms. Pallavi/ MS. PARUL Mr. Sanjay Chaudhary Mr. P. Shreedhar MR.VIKAS SAREEN Mr. Sanjay Saki Mr. Ajay Arora Mr. Pradeep Purbey Mrs. Sunita KUNWAR Mr. Pradeep Bhandari Mr. Abhilash MahesHWARi M/s Surefin Financial CONSULTANTS LTD. MR.Anurag Tripathi MR.Arvind Kumar Jaiswal MR.Shranik Chopra MR.Gaurav Anand MR.Prayag Sharma Mr. Girish/ Mr. Vicky Tyagi Mr. Mahesh Parsana Mr. Vikram Singh Mr. Vibhor Verma Mrs Rekha Sahni Mr Tirupati Mishra Mr. Rinku Gupta MR.Arvind Kumar Singh Brig. Mahendru Dr. Vinod Kumar Singh MR.Amitabh Gautam MR.Pravin C. Singh MR.Parijat Shukla MR.Abhinav Tyagi Mrs Ratna Kangal Mr Ajay Gupta Mr Chandan Kumar M/S Vyas Giannetti Creative pvt. Ltd Dr. R Pujari MRS.Kakoli Bhattacharya MR.ANUJ SINGH Mr Charan MR.Anil Padmanabhan Capt.SK Sahu Mrs Deepali Sen MRS.SRIRUPA TANDON M/S SYSTEMS AMERICA (INDIA) LTD MRS.DEEPIKA MAHESHWARI MRS.NABANITA DUTT MR.ARUN K GOEL MR.VIR SANGHVI MRS.RENU JOLLY MR.R.K. KHOSLA MR.ANUPAM MISHRA MR.M. SAMPATHKUMAR MRS.REETIKA NARANG MR.NAJEEB MOHAMMAD/ MR. JAVED IQBAL MR.SUNIL DHAWAN MR.NIREN SIROHI MRS.NIDHI THANKUR MR.MANOHAR NARWANI Mr.Abhishek & MRS.Sumegha Ms.Jincy K. John MR. KP SINGH MR.Ambati Venu MR.GG Joshi MR.Vivek K. Gupta MR.Rahul Bharadwaj MRS.Rupam MR.SK Kashyap MR.ANUPAM KR. SHARMA MR. N. K. MATHUR MR.S.V.GEORGE M/S TECHNOLOGICAL CONSERVATION GROUP, USA (TCG, USA Inc.) DEEPAK D.S. M/S AMB IT India Dr. Ajay Jain MR. SALABH AGARWAL MR.JOSHY CHACKO MR.RAHUL PANDEY MRS.Manju Sabharwal MRS.CHARISSE NATHAN GATES MR.RANJIT THAKUR Ms. HaRPINDER SINGH DHILLON Dr. Ratnesh Lal MR.Subir Mittal MR.Varun pratap singh MR.Pawan Gupta MR.abhishek kumar MRS.MEgha narula MR.ARINDAM BOSE MR.SANJEEV pandiya MR.Atul RAJDHAN MR.Pravesh Chopra MR.kanta pArsad M/S bachaat retail LTD. MRS.Ananya Karmakar MR.AJAY SHARMA MR.SURENDRA MISHRA MRS.ADITI MR.RAJIV MALHOTRA M/S IRB INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS LTD. MR.LOKESH KUMAR MR. S. RAGHUNATH |
||
RECENT PUBLICATIONS McDonald's pulled up for overcharging on cold drink bottle Leading fast food restaurant chain McDonald's has been pulled up for "unfair trade practices" by a consumer court for overcharging on a coke bottle against the printed price and asked to compensate the consumer. Anupam Tripathi, a resident of Patparganj in east Delhi, had gone to McDonald's in Preet Vihar in 2007 along with his family and ordered some burgers along with cold drinks. He was shocked to find McDonald's charging Rs.30 for a cold drink bottle against the printed price of Rs.20. He approached the east Delhi district consumer grievances court which found the restaurant guilty of overcharging. The court directed the restaurant chain to refund Tripathi Rs.10 and also pay him Rs.2,000 as compensation and Rs.1,000 as cost of litigation. McDonald's challenged the court order at the Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and stated that they had already revised the cold drink rates from Rs.20 to Rs.30 per bottle, which was reflected in the new menu. They told the Commission that the east Delhi consumer forum had referred to the old menu while passing the order. The counsel for the restaurant contended that the consumer had placed on record the old menu card, which was revised on May 1, 2007, and the bottle was purchased a few days later, on May 10. After hearing both the parties, the Commission dismissed the appeal filed by the restaurant chain and directed it to compensate Tripathi as directed by the district court. Justice J.D. Kapoor, president of the Commission, ruled: "The very connotation printed on the packaged goods, namely Maximum Retail Price (MRP), leaves no manner of doubt that no trader can charge more than the price mentioned on the packaged good." "The conduct of the appellants (McDonald's) squarely falls within the mischief of 'unfair trade practice' and 'deficiency in service' as they sold the article for a price which was more than the permissible maximum price," he ruled. In a similar ruling in 2005, a consumer forum had directed a restaurant in east Delhi to pay Rs.7,000 as compensation to a consumer for allegedly overcharging on a soft drink. M/s Aman Aahar, a franchisee of Nirulas chain of restaurants, was found guilty of deficiency in service for charging a consumer Rs.35 for a soft drink bottle which had Rs.15 printed as the maximum retail price. Ankit Jain, the complainant, also got a refund of Rs.20 that was overcharged by the restaurant in November 2005. Jain in his complaint said that he had placed a home delivery order with the restaurant in Mayur Vihar amounting to Rs.76, but when he received his order he found that a 500 ml bottle of cold drink had been billed at Rs.35 instead of Rs.20. During arguments before the forum, the restaurant officials claimed they could charge more on orders in which food was delivered at the customer's door steps. The forum, however, disagreed with the contention and ordered Nirulas to pay punitive damages of Rs.25,000 in favour of the State Consumer Welfare Fund.ks/rn/dg Visit the story at ::::::: http://news.webindia123.com/news/articles/World/20081005/1071244.html
NO EXTRA CHARGES FOR HOME DELIVERY:COURTS- A consumer court in Delhi levied a fine of Rs 3,000 on a fast food restaurantDelhi levied a fine of Rs 3,000 on a fast food restaurant for charging Rs 10 for charging Rs 10extra on home delivery of a soft drink. The companies delivering products at home cannot charge more than the maximum retail price.Anupam Tripathi, a lawyer by profession, had purchased a soft drink bottle, which costs Rs 20 from a restaurant at Preet Vihar in East Delhi. The restaurant charged him Rs 30, following which Anupam filed a case at the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum.According to the members According to the members of the forum, Meena Saxena, Mukul Mishra and D S Bawa, the restaurants can’t over charge the customers. To defend itself, the restaurant stated that due to the delivery services, the menu attached with thefood items was not updated.This judgment of the court would be beneficial for thousands of customers usingfree delivery system. “Retailers and restaurants could charge more than MRP only in cases where they were serving their customers in their resturants and providing added services such as AC, ambience, Music etc, however the same was never to hold in the case of Home delivery. However this was a grey area till this Order. This Order has put an end to that ambiguity and made it clear that packaged products in home delivery cannot be sold beyond MRP price. With this judgment of the forum, all customers will heave sigh of relief,” said Anupam. Found guilty |